It was really interesting watching the movie of Native American history during class. I think it is good to view American history through the Native American’s eyes. Throught the movie, there were a couple facts that stood out to me. First, I was surprised to hear that Native Americans also had a civil rights movement during the late 1960’s and early 1970’s. In the California K-12 educational system, you primarily hear about the Black and Chicano civil rights movements yet nothing is mentioned about the Native American civil rights movement. Another fact that caught my eye, was when I saw the image of a news paper article that said, “Indians taking City Jobs.” This quote is an example of how the dominant white American society has always used the excuse that minority groups are “taking their jobs away” in order to justify their discrimination towards them. Moreover, there was a part in the movie in which Kent Frizell, from the Department of Justice, was describing how Native Americans and the federal government came to a temporary agreement in the
Saturday, November 7, 2009
Thoughts on Movie
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I was also surprised to hear about the American Indian civil rights movement. Back in K-12 we went very in depth with the black civil rights movement and the Holocaust to the point that we knew them very intimately. Now I'm almost outraged that the Native American civil rights movement wasn't really even mentioned! I almost feel that because it was more recent it's more important to learn because of its relevance to our lives.
ReplyDeleteAlso, I totally agree with your views towards Kent Frizell. Every time that weasel came on screen I felt disgust and was angry with how he treated every situation.
Great analysis of Kent Frizell's language: "Moreover, there was a part in the movie in which Kent Frizell, from the Department of Justice, was describing how Native Americans and the federal government came to a temporary agreement in the Wounded Knee site. In this part, he mentions how he allowed a few Natives to ride in his helicopter in return for riding on the Natives “ponies.” The tone in which he mentioned this was a belittling one. He mentioned this in order to point out how supreme the white mans technology in comparison to that of the Natives." I agree 100%! I also like that the film interviewed him and gave him a chance to speak. It shows that it wasn't trying to be a one-sided documentary, and it gave almost all parties a chance to explain their situations. This is an excellent post that makes a lot of strong points about the specifics of the film!
ReplyDelete