Saturday, October 10, 2009
Who Understands Who?
In Linda Noel’s “Understanding Each Other,” the narrator is a woman while the speaker who is in quotes is a man whom was in a committed relationship with the woman. At first, the man mentions that the narrator is “too wild” but she does “not drink raw whisky” he means that she is not wild in the sense of being promiscuous or particularly social with others, he is referring to the woman’s free spirit and strong personality. He goes onto say that “when the salmon season returns [the woman] stand[s] among river willow shadow humming, all the time believing fish can understand why [she] is there.” The woman can identity with the salmon traveling against the current, which symbolizes how she can identify with people who are fighting against adversities in the world. After the man’s quote, the woman points out how the man “left her to marry one whose dreams are laced in perfume and dishwater suds.” This means that the man was preferred to be with a more passive woman. This other woman is not in though with nature because she is surrounded by artificial things such as “perfume” and “dishwater suds.” Overall, it seems like both the narrator and the speaker understand each other and have accepted their differences. The fact that the narrator chooses to say “So he left me” implies that she is not bewildered as to why he left her. Equally important is what the narrator did not say. She did not deny any of the speaker’s assumptions about her personality which implies that the might be true, therefore he also understands her.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This is an interesting response to the poem. I like the way that you analyze the image of the salmon swimming against the stream as a metaphor for the woman as not going with the stereotypical constructions of a "house wife." I'm also interested in your reading of the poem as one in which the two speakers understand each other. You might check out the blog "Live Life to the Fullest," where the author argues for the other side, that the two speakers clearly misunderstand one another. Thus, the real question is whether or not the poem's title is meant to be straightforward or ironic. Also, is the woman in touch with nature or does her partner just think that she is? In other words, is he imposing a stereotype on her based on his ideas of Native women? You could certainly argue either side to this issue.
ReplyDeleteI like your comment about how the woman is swimming against the current. I had a hard time understanding why that part was in the poem, and I think your analysis of it really fits into the main theme.
ReplyDeleteWow! I really liked your interpretation of this poem. It really made things fit together and made sense of the title of the poem. I also think that it is important to consider the idea of the man's point of view possibly not representing the truth about the woman. Maybe her just saw her in that way and that isn't who she is at all. I am still convinced by your interpretation, but just thought I would add that in there!
ReplyDelete